Skip to main content
· 6/11/1966

Home-Stake Production Co. v. Tri-State Pipe Co.

Citations

  • 415 P.2d 377
  • 197 Kan. 163
  • 25 Oil & Gas Rep. 486
  • 1966 Kan. LEXIS 366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We find nothing in the agreement diluting the right to partition and nothing which can be considered as impliedly prohibiting it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.