Appellate Court of Illinois· 10/23/1991
Johnson v. Belleville Radiologists, Ltd.
Citations
- 581 N.E.2d 750
- 221 Ill. App. 3d 100
- 163 Ill. Dec. 596
- 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1830
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Once the parties represent to the court that they have reached a good faith settlement, a presumption of validity exists.
- “The provision for a setoff contained in the Contribution Act is not the source of the defendants’ right to a setoff; it is merely a codification of that right. Defen- dants were entitled to a setoff at common law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chapman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pasquale v. Speed Products EngineeringIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-08-10· cited 165×
- Babb v. City of ChampaignIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 91×
- McDermott v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-12-04· cited 54×
- Sompo Japan Insurance v. Nippon Cargo Airlines Co.Seventh Circuit· 2008-04-11· cited 51×
- Happel v. Walmart Stores, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2010-04-19· cited 48×
- Yoder v. FergusonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-03-06· cited 28×
- Babikian v. MruzAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-07-18· cited 28×
- Portalatin v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2018-08-13· cited 27×
- Foster v. KanuriAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-02-08· cited 20×
- Kipnis v. MeltzerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-07· cited 14×
- Palos Electric Co. v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-30· cited 11×
- Readel v. TowneAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-02-01· cited 11×
- Barash v. Morris (In Re Morris)C.D. Illinois· 1993-02-18· cited 8×
- Maher v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-12-07· cited 4×
- Patton v. Carbondale Clinic, S.C.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-02-11· cited 3×
- Blagg v. F.W.D. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-07-20· cited 1×
- Sompo Japan Insur v. Nippon Cargo AirlineSeventh Circuit· 2008-04-11
- Palos Electric Co. v. ICAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-30
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ballweg v. City of SpringfieldIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-10-17· cited 238×
- Rakowski v. LucenteIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-11-30· cited 203×
- Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-19· cited 128×
- Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-11-30· cited 119×
- Henry v. St. John's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 97×
- Page v. HibbardIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-11-16· cited 63×
- Blagg v. Illinois F.W.D. Truck & Equipment Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-03-28· cited 55×
- McKanna v. Duo-Fast Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-09-15· cited 47×
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. American Transit Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1951-01-18· cited 35×
- Perez v. EspinozaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-10-23· cited 29×
- Doellman v. Warner & Swasey Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-09-23· cited 29×
- O'CONNOR v. Pinto Trucking Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-11-18· cited 26×
- Snoddy v. Teepak, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-05-14· cited 23×
- Lorenz v. Air Illinois, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-18· cited 22×
- Ballweg v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-02-08· cited 21×
- Pritchard v. SWEDISHAMERICAN HOSPITALAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-07-17· cited 18×
- Blagg v. Illinois F.W.D. Truck & Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-08-11· cited 12×
- Blagg v. ILL. FWD TRUCK & EQUIP. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-08-11· cited 8×
- Melzer v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.