Skip to main content
Sixth Circuit· 5/17/2010

Johnson v. Bell

Citations

  • 605 F.3d 333
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 9975
  • 2010 WL 1948202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Rule 60(b) “is inherently equitable in nature,” and “empowers district courts to revise judgments when necessary to ensure their integrity”
  • noting that a claim of fraud upon the court requires a showing that the court was deceived
  • choosing to construe a notice of appeal as an application for a COA “rather than remand to enable petitioner to file an application for a COA”
  • characterizing Rule 60(b) as “inherently equitable in nature”
  • construing notice of appeal as application for COA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boggs, Norris, Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.