Skip to main content
· 8/17/1989

Johnson & Johnson v. Coopervision, Inc.

Citations

  • 720 F. Supp. 1116
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 159
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10575
  • 1989 WL 102607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding party indispensable where state court litigation involving all principal actors was on-going
  • “[i]t would be premature for this Court to endeavor to decide whether Iolab and Johnson & Johnson are in privity in bringing the instant action”
  • “While the only signatories to the Purchase Agreement are Johnson & Johnson and Cooper, another entity, Johnson’s Iolab subsidiary is inextricably linked to the transaction. Iolab is a necessary party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Latchum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.