· 8/17/1989
Johnson & Johnson v. Coopervision, Inc.
Citations
- 720 F. Supp. 1116
- 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 159
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10575
- 1989 WL 102607
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding party indispensable where state court litigation involving all principal actors was on-going
- “[i]t would be premature for this Court to endeavor to decide whether Iolab and Johnson & Johnson are in privity in bringing the instant action”
- “While the only signatories to the Purchase Agreement are Johnson & Johnson and Cooper, another entity, Johnson’s Iolab subsidiary is inextricably linked to the transaction. Iolab is a necessary party”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Latchum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.