John Eugene Youmans v. M. J. Oschner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff had not established serious medical need when he had “several cuts and abrasions on his head, face, shoulder, elbow, and hand” and appeared to be bleeding slightly
• concluding that the booking officer did not violate the plaintiffs constitutional rights when he spent three hours interviewing and booking the plaintiff before getting him treatment for visible cuts and bruises caused by the arresting officers
• stating that “the threshold of deliberate indifference is connected to combinations of diverse interdependent factual elements”
• holding that delaying USCA11 Case: 20-10150 Document: 90-3 Date Filed: 10/11/2023 Page: 15 of 23 20-10150 Opinion of the Court 15 treatment for non-bleeding cuts and bruises was excusable because police needed to book the plaintiff into prison
• holding that delaying USCA11 Case: 20-10150 Document: 90-1 Date Filed: 10/11/2023 Page: 15 of 23 20-10150 Opinion of the Court 15 treatment for non-bleeding cuts and bruises was excusable because police needed to book the plaintiff into prison
• noting that “the reason for the delay must weigh in the [deliberate indifference] inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).