Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 3/5/2024

John Doe 1 v. Apple Inc.

Citations

  • 96 F.4th 403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a “direct and continuous relationship” beyond the mere purchasing of a commodity may amount to “participation in a venture”
  • holding that allegations of child labor, while “[n]o doubt [] abhorrent[,]” did not meet the statutory definition of forced labor
  • holding to the contrary where the defendant only “purchas[ed] a commodity”
  • deeming insufficient plaintiffs’ allegations that the technology companies, with others, “control at least 80-85 percent of the DRC cobalt supply chain”
  • relying on dictionary definitions to define 16 participation in a venture in section 1595
  • defining “venture” as a “business enterprise involving some risk in expectation of gain”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.