Dearth v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Dearth has standing because “the challenged provisions have ... thwarted [his] best efforts to acquire a firearm”
• holding that Dearth has standing because “the challenged provisions have . . . thwarted [his] best efforts to acquire a firearm”
• holding that in cases seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, a plaintiff must show that it is “suffering an ongoing injury or faces an immediate threat of injury” to have standing to seek relief
• explaining that to obtain forward-looking relief, the plaintiff “must show [she] is suffering an ongoing injury or faces an immediate threat of injury”
• affirming that the petitioner suffered a cognizable injury where “the federal regulatory scheme thwarts his continuing desire to purchase a firearm”
• affirming that the petitioner suffered a cognizable injury where “the federal regulatory scheme thwarts his continuing desire to purchase a firearm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).