Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 6/3/2011

John Coffin v. Stacy Brandau

Citations

  • 642 F.3d 999
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 11353
  • 2011 WL 2162997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a “general constitutional rule already identified in the decisional law may apply with obvious clarity to the specific conduct in question”
  • explaining that we look only to binding precedent to determine clearly established law
  • contrasting a garage attached to a home and enclosed by three walls and a door with a carport that is open and exposed to the public in deciding whether an officer’s entry into the garage violated the Fourth Amendment
  • contrasting a garage attached to a home and enclosed by three walls and a door with a carport that is open and exposed to the public in deciding whether an officer’s entry into the garage violated the Fourth Amendment
  • “‘obvious clarity’ cases” are “rare,” a “narrow exception,” and “very occasionally encounter[ed]” (internal citations omitted)
  • “Our case law has made clear that ‘obvious clarity’ cases will be rare.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubina, Tjoflat, Edmondson, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus, Wilson, Pryor, Martin, Anderson, Black

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.