· 8/13/2012
Stephen G. Loftus v. Ester Clark-Moore
Citations
- 690 F.3d 1200
- 2012 WL 3263023
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16895
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a plaintiff may rely on a “broader, clearly es- tablished principle [that] should control the novel facts [of the] sit- uation
- explaining that a plaintiff may rely on a “broader, clearly es- tablished principle [that] should control the novel facts [of the] sit- uation
- explaining that a plaintiff may rely on a “broader, clearly es- tablished principle [that] should control the novel facts [of the] sit- uation
- a decision from one of our sister circuits “cannot provide ‘clearly established’ law in this Circuit”
- a decision from one of our sister circuits “cannot provide ‘clearly established’ law in this Circuit”
- “ ‘[t]he [controlling] principle must be established with obvious clarity by ... case law’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pryor, Fay, Quist
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.