Skip to main content
· 8/13/2012

Stephen G. Loftus v. Ester Clark-Moore

Citations

  • 690 F.3d 1200
  • 2012 WL 3263023
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a plaintiff may rely on a “broader, clearly es- tablished principle [that] should control the novel facts [of the] sit- uation
  • explaining that a plaintiff may rely on a “broader, clearly es- tablished principle [that] should control the novel facts [of the] sit- uation
  • explaining that a plaintiff may rely on a “broader, clearly es- tablished principle [that] should control the novel facts [of the] sit- uation
  • a decision from one of our sister circuits “cannot provide ‘clearly established’ law in this Circuit”
  • a decision from one of our sister circuits “cannot provide ‘clearly established’ law in this Circuit”
  • “ ‘[t]he [controlling] principle must be established with obvious clarity by ... case law’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pryor, Fay, Quist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.