Jiang v. Garland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Niz- Chavez and Pereira do not render [orders to show cause] insufficient to trigger the stop-time rule if they omit the date or place of the hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Winston Gutierrez-Alm v. Merrick Garland
  Ninth Circuit· 2023-03-15· cited 60×
• J-L-L
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2023-02-10· cited 2×
• Yupangui-Yunga v. Bondi
  Second Circuit· 2025-10-24

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pereira v. Sessions
  Supreme Court· 2018-06-21· cited 1,012×
• Manzur v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  Second Circuit· 2007-07-16· cited 649×
• Stanislav Iavorski v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Second Circuit· 2000-11-07· cited 475×
• Luna v. Holder
  Second Circuit· 2011-03-03· cited 102×
• Lucina Rojas-Reyes, A/K/A Lucina Mendoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Second Circuit· 2000-12-15· cited 94×
• MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ and CAPULA-CORTES
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2019-07-01· cited 59×
• Rebeca Perez-Perez v. Monty Wilkinson
  Seventh Circuit· 2021-02-11· cited 8×