Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/5/2015

Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell

Citations

  • 798 F.3d 759
  • 2015 WL 4636957

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “When a state court may draw a principled distinction between the case before it and Supreme Court caselaw,” federal ha-beas relief is not available
  • “[T]he state argues that a Lackey claim is an individual challenge, ... while [the district court’s opinion in] Jones was based on the theory that the California system itself creates the constitutional infirmity_ We disagree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ikuta, Smith, Murguia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.