Ninth Circuit· 8/5/2015
Jesse Andrews v. Kevin Chappell
Citations
- 798 F.3d 759
- 2015 WL 4636957
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “When a state court may draw a principled distinction between the case before it and Supreme Court caselaw,” federal ha-beas relief is not available
- “[T]he state argues that a Lackey claim is an individual challenge, ... while [the district court’s opinion in] Jones was based on the theory that the California system itself creates the constitutional infirmity_ We disagree.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ikuta, Smith, Murguia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.