Jerry Lee Staley v. Kurt Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “several examples of speech or expressive conduct that could conceivably be restricted under the statute” did not render anti-stalking statute unconstitutional
• upholding conviction based on Michigan stalking statute that excluded from definition of “harassment” any “constitutionally protected activity or conduct that serves a legitimate purpose”
• federal habeas No. 05-1798 Cress v. Palmer Page 8 jurisdiction “require[s] a claim of legal error in the original proceedings”
• finding the White court's conclusions to be reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).