District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/28/2002
Jensen v. Jensen
Citations
- 824 So. 2d 315
- 2002 WL 1971880
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that a constructive trust is a deferred distribution method and that \[t]he deferred distribution approach for a stock option that cannot be valued as of yet is the only prudent and plausible approach to adopt\
- using a constructive trust essentially as a deferred distribution plan \because it was the most practical method of distributing the unvested stock options\ that were not yet capable of being valued
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Broemer v. BroemerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-06· cited 22×
- Ruberg v. RubergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-07· cited 21×
- Alpha v. AlphaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-05· cited 19×
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-06· cited 18×
- Shorb v. ShorbCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-03-19· cited 17×
- Hollister v. HollisterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-26· cited 7×
- Largaespada v. LargaespadaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-14· cited 1×
- Goodman v. GoodmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-10-13
- JOSEPH E. ABDO v. KHALIL ABDODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-08-07
- Hecht v. HechtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-04
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
- Pascale v. PascaleSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-07-10· cited 172×
- In Re Marriage of HugCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-04-20· cited 80×
- Green v. GreenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-08· cited 50×
- DeLoach v. DeLoachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-21· cited 39×
- Boyett v. BoyettSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-11· cited 37×
- Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1983-10-31· cited 28×
- Callahan v. CallahanNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-05-18· cited 26×
- Marriage of Salstrom v. SalstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-04-21· cited 23×
- Fisher v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-04-25· cited 17×
- Kirkland v. KirklandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-27· cited 13×
- Caruso v. CarusoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-10· cited 11×
- In Re Marriage of MoodyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-12-05· cited 11×
- Undercuffler v. UndercufflerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-07· cited 10×
- Seither v. SeitherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-15· cited 9×
- Langevin v. LangevinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-06· cited 8×
- Arze v. Sadough-ArzeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-27· cited 8×
- Olsen v. KeeferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-27· cited 5×
- Guttler v. GuttlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-07· cited 5×
- Brown v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.