Undercuffler v. Undercuffler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in imputing income to the husband where he testified that he \hoped\ he could earn as much as $40,000 per year
• holding, even though temporary order designated father as primary residential parent, no abuse of discretion in awarding child support to mother where she had actual custody
• reversing child support calculation which included a deduction for court-ordered support where no evidence was presented that the husband was currently paying that obligation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).