Jennings Bros. & Co. v. Beale
Citations
- 158 Pa. 283
- 27 A. 948
- 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1580
Syllabus
<p>Equity — Jurisdiction—Trespass on lands in another county.</p> <p>Where a court of equity has jurisdiction of a person, it may issue an injunction to prevent trespass upon lands in another county.</p> <p>Equity jurisdiction — Question of title.</p> <p>Where, on a bill for an injunction to restrain a trespass upon real estate, the deed under which plaintiff claims is recited in the chain of title and is admitted by the pleadings, and the only question is. whether or not it confers a right to mine claimed by plaintiff, no such question of title arises as may deprive a court of equity of jurisdiction over the case.</p> <p>Injunction — Continuous trespass.</p> <p>Where a bill in equity alleges the exclusive right in plaintiffs to mine coal in certain lands, and avers that defendant is taking it out and shipping it by the carload in such quantities that he will soon exhaust the mines, the court may restrain by injunction the continuous trespass alleged</p> <p>Heed — Exclusive grant — Eight to mine coal.</p> <p>A deed of bargain and sale, with words of inheritance, granted “ all those five certain lots or pieces of ground,” etc., and “ all the right, title, interest and claim of the parties of the first part of, in, to and out of all the gas from a certain well, on all that certaiu lot,” etc., and “ also the perpetual right to mine, dig and carry away coal, in and from all the veins of coal in and under all the following described tracts of land.” A royalty was reserved to the grantor on all coal mined. Held, that the omission of the word “ all ” before coal, and the reservation of a royalty, showed that it was not the intention of the parties to convey the coal absolutely, or to exclude the grantor from mining.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Court enjoins Pennsylvania resident from trespassing on lands located in another state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cxteiam, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cattlemens Trust Co. of Ft. Worth v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1915-10-09· cited 37×
- Hummel v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1959-05-08· cited 28×
- Kane & Elk Railroad v. Pittsburgh & Western R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-06-27· cited 15×
- Clad v. PaistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-05-03· cited 11×
- Lindsley v. Union Silver Star Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1901-10-17· cited 10×
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-02-22· cited 8×
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. WynkoopSupreme Court of Kansas· 1906-05-12· cited 8×
- City of Jamestown v. Pennsylvania Gas Co.Second Circuit· 1924-06-28· cited 7×
- Shawville Coal Co. v. MenardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-26· cited 4×
- Kazos v. DiakakisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-26· cited 3×
- Saltsburg Colliery Co. v. Trucks Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-01-07· cited 2×
- Leap v. LeaheySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1917-07-13· cited 2×
- Summers v. Bloomsburg & Sullivan RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1904-04-18
- Republic Connellsville Coke Co. v. Century Coke Co.Fayette County Court· 1923-02-27
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.