Clark v. Clark
Citations
- 180 Pa. 186
- 36 A. 747
- 1897 Pa. LEXIS 900
Syllabus
<p>Equity — Practice, O. P. — Appeal—Making up record.</p> <p>Where a record has been made up and certified for appeal, it is improper practice to pin the decree of the court below to another paper in the case. If the record was made up before the decree was entered, the decree should be sent up by a special return sur diminution of record.</p> <p>Trusts and trustees — Accounts—Equity jurisdiction — Acts of April 25, 1850, April 22, 1856 and June 14, 1836.</p> <p>On a bill in equity, it appeared that the defendant who had the legal title to certain real and personal estate agreed to hold the property subject to certain interests of the plaintiff and others therein, and to account in the mode and upon the principles set out in the written agreement. This agreement was the foundation of the bill. The property in question was situated in McKean county, Pennsylvania. The bill averred that the defendant “ resides and is domiciled in the city of Philadelphia.” The defendant admitted in his answer the truth of this averment. Held, (1) that the defendant by the agreement constituted himself a trustee, and became liable to account in' any court having jurisdiction over him, not by virtue of any statute as to tenants in common, but by the general jurisdiction of chancery to compel performance of equitable duties or the enforcement of equitable rights wherever the party may be found, without reference to the locality of the land; (2) that as far as the jurisdiction of the court was concerned, the Acts of April 25, 1850, sec. 24, P. L. 573, April 22, 1856, P. L. 502, and June 14, 1836, sec. 15, P. L. 632, had no application.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Pennsylvania trustee required to account for real and personal property over which Court had no jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lehigh & New England Railroad v. HanhauserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-10-05· cited 8×
- Kazos v. DiakakisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-26· cited 3×
- Waynesburg Borough's North WardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-12-10· cited 2×
- Flynn v. SieversPike County Court of Common Pleas· 1956-10-22· cited 1×
- Elizardi v. KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1905-05-01
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.