Skip to main content

Jenkins v. State

Citations

  • 1 So. 3d 317
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 348
  • 2009 WL 127873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[Wjhere one or more of the elements of the crime are proven by direct evidence, this heightened standard of review is not applicable.”
  • “[W]here one or more of the elements of the crime are proven by direct evidence, this heightened standard of review is not applicable.” (citing State v. Burrows, 940 So.2d 1259, 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006))
  • “[T]he State ... is required during its case in chief to present a prima facie case of guilt through the offer of competent substantial evidence on each element of the crime ... failing which the accused is entitled to a judgment of acquittal.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ramirez, Shepherd, Salter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.