Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 3/22/2010

Jeffredo v. MacArro

Citations

  • 599 F.3d 913
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 5968
  • 2010 WL 1006977

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court dismissal 20 of 25 U.S.C. § 1303 petition was proper where appellants were not detained
  • concluding no access to facilities, including inability of children to attend school, did not rise to a severe restraint on liberty
  • refusing to consider the plaintiffs' claims for exclusion and eviction from the reservation because the plaintiffs had not exhausted their tribal remedies
  • refusing to consider the plaintiffs’ claims for exclusion and eviction from the reservation because the plaintiffs had not exhausted their tribal remedies
  • “[A] threat of confinement is not severe nor immediate enough to justify the writ.”
  • “[A]ll federal courts addressing the issue mandate that two prerequisites be satisfied before they will hear a habeas petition filed under the ICRA: The petitioner must be in custody, and the petitioner must first exhaust tribal remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rawlinson, Smith, Wilken

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Jeffredo v. MacArro

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.