Skip to main content

Jean v. State

Citations

  • 638 So. 2d 995
  • 1994 WL 261315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that knowledge and dominion and control are separate elements and stating that \[i]t is conceivable that an accused might be well aware of the presence of the substance but have no ability to maintain control over it\
  • recognizing that knowledge and dominion and control are separate elements and stating that \[i]t is conceivable that an accused might be well aware of the presence of the substance but have no ability to maintain control over it\
  • recognizing that knowledge and dominion and control are separate elements and stating that “ [i]t is conceivable that an accused might be well aware of the presence of the substance but have no ability to maintain control over it”
  • “It is conceivable that an accused might be well aware of the presence of the substance but have no ability to maintain control over it.”
  • \appellant's complaint of an improper comment on his right to remain silent was waived when appellant refused the court's offer of a curative instruction\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.