District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/15/1994
Jean v. State
Citations
- 638 So. 2d 995
- 1994 WL 261315
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that knowledge and dominion and control are separate elements and stating that \[i]t is conceivable that an accused might be well aware of the presence of the substance but have no ability to maintain control over it\
- recognizing that knowledge and dominion and control are separate elements and stating that \[i]t is conceivable that an accused might be well aware of the presence of the substance but have no ability to maintain control over it\
- recognizing that knowledge and dominion and control are separate elements and stating that “ [i]t is conceivable that an accused might be well aware of the presence of the substance but have no ability to maintain control over it”
- “It is conceivable that an accused might be well aware of the presence of the substance but have no ability to maintain control over it.”
- \appellant's complaint of an improper comment on his right to remain silent was waived when appellant refused the court's offer of a curative instruction\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-15· cited 51×
- Martoral v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-17· cited 24×
- Jennings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-11· cited 14×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-24· cited 13×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-19· cited 12×
- Dormezil v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-31· cited 10×
- Scruggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-04-25· cited 8×
- Ball v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-26· cited 7×
- Ayalavillamizar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-12· cited 6×
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-31· cited 4×
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-03· cited 4×
- Corker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-12· cited 3×
- Nicholson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-27· cited 3×
- Daniels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-01-31· cited 2×
- Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-03· cited 2×
- State v. GiraltDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14· cited 2×
- State v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-13· cited 1×
- Bryant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-15
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-03· cited 180×
- Frank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-05-23· cited 141×
- Mohawk Liqueur Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-04-20· cited 80×
- Hively v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-07-16· cited 65×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-09-26· cited 42×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-06-06· cited 34×
- James Bass v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1964-01-22· cited 33×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-04· cited 31×
- Willis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-24· cited 27×
- Griffin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-04-09· cited 26×
- Medlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-06-06· cited 15×
- Kickasola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-22· cited 14×
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-19· cited 10×
- Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-19· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.