Skip to main content

Corker v. State

Citations

  • 31 So. 3d 958
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4856
  • 2010 WL 1433172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]he fact that drugs were openly within appellant’s line of sight is evidence from which appellant’s knowledge of the presence of the [drugs] may be inferred.”
  • holding, in a review of probation revocation, that a male driver did not have dominion and control over “marijuana in a multicolored makeup pouch concealed in the back seat of the car near where the female passenger in question was sitting”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Padovano, Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.