Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 1/31/2014

Jarvis v. Parker

Citations

  • 13 F. Supp. 3d 74
  • 2014 WL 346077
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • describing the reason for the delay as the “most important” factor (cleaned up)
  • without more, “basic procedural error [does not] qualify as excusable neglect”
  • “This case . . . represents garden-variety attorney error. To premise relief under Rule 60(b)(6) on such a basis would do violence to the Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit's instructions that this provision should be “sparingly used.” Kramer, 481 F.3d at 792.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kollar, Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Jarvis v. Parker

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.