Skip to main content
· 4/10/1992

Jarvis v. Drake

Citations

  • 830 P.2d 23
  • 250 Kan. 645
  • 1992 Kan. LEXIS 93

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting rule which affords judicial immunity to participants in the attorney discipline process
  • interpreting rule which affords judicial immunity to participants in the attorney discipline process
  • “If Rule 223 were ambiguous, then our intent in adopting the rule and amendment would be controlling”
  • where absolute immunity was granted a bar complainant in a lawyer’s claim for malicious prosecution, libel and tortious interference with contract
  • doctrine of absolute immunity barred attorney’s suit against former client’s spouse who filed grievance against attorney that was later dismissed
  • doctrine of absolute immunity barred attorney's suit against former client's spouse who filed grievance against attorney that was later dismissed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.