· 4/10/1992
Jarvis v. Drake
Citations
- 830 P.2d 23
- 250 Kan. 645
- 1992 Kan. LEXIS 93
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting rule which affords judicial immunity to participants in the attorney discipline process
- interpreting rule which affords judicial immunity to participants in the attorney discipline process
- “If Rule 223 were ambiguous, then our intent in adopting the rule and amendment would be controlling”
- where absolute immunity was granted a bar complainant in a lawyer’s claim for malicious prosecution, libel and tortious interference with contract
- doctrine of absolute immunity barred attorney’s suit against former client’s spouse who filed grievance against attorney that was later dismissed
- doctrine of absolute immunity barred attorney's suit against former client's spouse who filed grievance against attorney that was later dismissed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allegrucci
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.