Skip to main content

Jarrett v. E. L. Harper & Son, Inc.

Citations

  • 235 S.E.2d 362
  • 160 W. Va. 399
  • 1977 W. Va. LEXIS 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiffs could not recover for mental pain and suffering where they sought recovery for loss of use of their property
  • “When the injury is temporary, the proper measure of damages is the cost of remedy, removal or abatement; compensation for loss of use or rent; and reimbursement for actual expenses caused by the injury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harshbarger, Neely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.