Severt v. Beckley Coals, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the necessity of a balancing of the comparative hardship or convenience test in light of all the circumstances involved
• once future damages are recovered “there can be no second recovery for [the nuisance’s] continuance;” internal quotation omitted
• evidence sufficient to submit both negligence and nui- sanee theories of recovery to jury
• evidence sufficient to submit both negligence and nuisance theories of recovery to jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).