Skip to main content
· 7/12/1983

Jarr v. Seeco Construction Co.

Citations

  • 666 P.2d 392
  • 35 Wash. App. 324
  • 1983 Wash. App. LEXIS 2579

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that jury could find it foreseeable that a prospective purchaser could be injured while walking through active construction site with broker
  • holding that jury could find it foreseeable that a prospective purchaser could be injured while walking through active construction site with broker
  • discussing rule in relation to stack of sheetrock that injured prospective customer at home construction site
  • finding a realtor showing property may be held liable for harm caused thereby under a theory of premises liability based on the contractual relationship with the owner
  • discussing rule in relation to stack of sheetrock that injured prospective customer at home construction site
  • finding a duty was owed by a real estate agent conducting an open house when the agent admitted he was in “complete control” of the property and conceded that he “was a possessor of land for purposes of premises liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ringold, Durham, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.