Skip to main content
· 12/27/1985

Bozung v. Condominium Builders, Inc.

Citations

  • 711 P.2d 1090
  • 42 Wash. App. 442

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the work site where a subcontractor’s employee was injured was not a “common work site” under Kelley because only one subcontractor was “active on the site at the time of the accident”
  • affirming summary judgment in favor of general contractor in personal injury action brought by subcontractor employee
  • general contractor’s right to order work stoppage, to control work order, and to inspect work progress does not prove its control over subcontractor’s safety practices
  • \[G]eneral contractual rights [such] as the right to order the work stopped or to control the order of the work or the right to inspect the progress of the work do not mean that the general contractor controls the method of the subcontractor's work.\
  • “[General contractual rights [such] as the right to order the work stopped or to control the order of the work or the right to inspect the progress of the work do not mean that the general contractor controls the method of the subcontractor’s work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reed

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.