S.D. West Virginia· 1/17/1963
Jardine v. Intehar
Citations
- 213 F. Supp. 598
- 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6857
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A change in residence for the purpose of seeking employment or for convenience in working conditions does not, without more, dictate a change in domicile.”
- “A change of domicile does not depend so much upon the intention to remain in the new place for a definite o[r] indefinite period, as upon its being without an intention to return.”
- voter registration raises presumption of citizenship
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Field
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-07-13· cited 45×
- Strabala v. ZhangN.D. Illinois· 2016-11-18· cited 44×
- Shaw v. ShawWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1972-03-07· cited 18×
- Dorothy Jean Ramsey and Wayne A. Ramsey, Her Husband v. Mellon National Bank and Trust CompanyThird Circuit· 1965-09-15· cited 15×
- Smith v. Wellberg (In Re Wellberg)E.D. Virginia· 1981-06-12· cited 12×
- Ramsey v. Mellon National Bank & Trust Co.W.D. Pennsylvania· 1964-06-24· cited 10×
- Linville v. PriceS.D. West Virginia· 1983-07-22· cited 9×
- Simmons v. Skyway of OcalaS.D. Georgia· 1984-07-02· cited 8×
- Cressler v. NeuenschwanderD. Kansas· 1996-06-20· cited 8×
- In Re KoonsE.D. Virginia· 1998-09-25· cited 3×
- Messersmith v. MatteucciE.D. California· 1966-10-11· cited 3×
- Howze v. HartmanE.D. Tennessee· 1980-05-05· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.