Messick v. Southern Pennsylvania Bus Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in finding that plaintiff was domiciled in Delaware, attaching significance to his home ownership, bank account, and payment of taxes in Delaware
• “Plaintiffs registration of his automobile in Pennsylvania is inconclusive in establishing his domicile.”
• “Citizenship and domicile are substantially synonymous terms and, with respect to the jurisdiction of federal courts, domicile is the test of citizenship.” (citing, inter alia, Bjornquist v. Bos. & A.R. Co., 250 F. 929, 933 (1st Cir. 1918)
• “Citizenship and domicile are substantially synonymous terms and, with respect to the jurisdiction of federal courts, domicile is the test of citizenship.” (citing, inter alia, Bjornquist v. Bos. & A.R. Co., 250 F. 929, 933 (1st Cir. 1918)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).