Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc. v. Bailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \This Court has previously recognized the ineffectiveness of voir dire in detecting juror bias created by pretrial publicity.\
• Jury awarded each plaintiff $10 million even though plaintiffs varied widely in age and alleged injury
• direct liability for parent when parent “actively participated” in the alleged wrongful conduct
• where Justice Easley dissented because “litigants, their lawyers, and the trial courts are left without a clue as to how to proceed in [mass tort] cases,” and offered a criticism of the muddy distinction of “mature” and “immature” torts made in Armond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).