Skip to main content

Fitch v. Valentine

Citations

  • 959 So. 2d 1012
  • 2007 WL 1151452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence that plaintiff lost his house, custody of his child, and the loss of his marriage and other noneconomic damages was sufficient for the jury to establish the loss suffered
  • holding evidence that plaintiff lost his house, custody of his child, and the loss of his marriage and other noneconomic damages was sufficient for the jury to establish the loss suffered
  • “The key time frame for the tort of alienation of affections is that of the marriage .... ”
  • “Issues not raised at trial cannot be raised on appeal.” (citing Southern v. Miss. State Hosp., 853 So. 2d 1212, 1214-15 (Miss. 2003))
  • The tort of alienation of affection provides a cause of action against a third party who interferes in a marriage.
  • “this Court applies the deferential abuse of discretion standard of review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Fitch v. Valentine

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.