Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/15/2002
Jannot v. Jannot
Citations
- 110 Wash. App. 16
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The court should require something more than unsupported conclusions and the unfortunate petty sniping that sometimes goes on between warring parties to a dissolution action.”
- adequate cause requires “‘something more than prima facie allegations which, if proven, might permit inferences sufficient to establish grounds for a custody change.’” (emphasis added) (quoting In re Marriage of Roorda, 25 Wn. App. 849, 852, 611 P.2d 794 (1980))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re the Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 183×
- In re the Marriage of ChandolaWashington Supreme Court· 2014-06-19· cited 163×
- In Re Marriage of RideoutWashington Supreme Court· 2003-10-27· cited 156×
- Jannot v. JannotWashington Supreme Court· 2003-03-27· cited 107×
- In Re Parentage of JannotWashington Supreme Court· 2003-04-30· cited 85×
- In re the Marriage of ZiglerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-04· cited 72×
- In Re Marriage of Zigler and SidwellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-04· cited 69×
- Hazen v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-07-02· cited 38×
- In Re Parentage of JHCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-23· cited 31×
- In re the Marriage of DrlikCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-06· cited 28×
- In Re Marriage of DrlikCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-06· cited 27×
- In re the Marriage of RideoutCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-02-22· cited 16×
- Rideout v. RideoutCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-02-22· cited 15×
- State v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-18· cited 12×
- In re the Parentage of M.F.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-11-05· cited 11×
- In Re Parentage of MFCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-11-05· cited 10×
- In Re Marriage of MaughanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 7×
- Maughan v. MaughanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-09· cited 7×
- Marriage Of Alexandra Swaka v. James SwakaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-02-20
- In re Marriage of ChandolaWashington Supreme Court· 2014-06-19
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re the Marriage of LandryWashington Supreme Court· 1985-05-09· cited 144×
- Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-09-25· cited 92×
- Brester v. BollenbacherCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-05-18· cited 63×
- State v. CalkinsWashington Supreme Court· 1957-08-15· cited 62×
- In the Matter of Marriage of SternCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-04-30· cited 62×
- In Re Parentage of SchroederCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-05-18· cited 62×
- In Re the Marriage of RoordaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-14· cited 48×
- Matter of Marriage of ShryockCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-02-07· cited 35×
- In Re the Marriage of MangiolaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-20· cited 15×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-05-05· cited 13×
- Okamoto v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-26· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.