In Re Marriage of Rideout

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming Division Two’s decision that sufficient evidence supported the trial court’s findings of contempt based on an entirely documentary record where an outcome determinative credibility issue was before the court in a contempt proceeding
• \[A] party is entitled to an award of attorney fees on appeal to the extent the fees relate to the issue of contempt.\
• \[A] party is entitled to an award of attorney fees on appeal to the extentthe fees relate to the issue of contempt.\
• \[A] party is entitled to an award of attorney fees on appeal to the extent the fees relate to the issue of contempt.\
• where court holds a hearing and weighs contradictory evidence before entry of a protection order, the proper standard of review is substantial evidence
• \[T]he substantial evidence standard of review should be applied . . . where competing documentary evidence had to be weighed and conflicts resolved.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).