Second Circuit· 8/27/2012
Janese v. Fay
Citations
- 692 F.3d 221
- 54 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1369
- 2012 WL 3642315
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 18160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the district court \properly denied the motion to amend following its denial of the motion for [relief from the judgment]\
- concluding that the district court “properly denied the motion to amend following its denial of the motion for [relief from the judgment]”
- eliminating Siskind’s distinction between single-employer and multi-employer pension plans and holding that no employers act in a fiduciary capacity when modifying, adopting, or amending plans
- “[A]mendment of a complaint becomes significantly more difficult when a plaintiff waits … until after judgment has been entered.”
- resolution of “issue of fact” as to knowledge of fraud “was not proper at the pleading stage”
- “[A]mendment of a complaint becomes significantly more difficult when a plaintiff waits, as the Plaintiffs in this case did, until after judgment has been entered.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Winter, Pooler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. ThomasTenth Circuit· 2019-10-01· cited 20×
- Jander v. Ret. Plans Comm. IbmSecond Circuit· 2018-12-10· cited 19×
- Massaro v. PalladinoSecond Circuit· 2021-11-30· cited 15×
- Demopoulos v. Anchor Tank Lines, LLCS.D. New York· 2015-07-27· cited 15×
- In re Express Scripts/Anthem Erisa Litig.S.D. Illinois· 2018-01-05· cited 15×
- American Psychiatric Assoc. v. Anthem Health PlansD. Connecticut· 2014-09-25· cited 12×
- Leber v. Citigroup 401(k) Plan Investment CommitteeS.D. New York· 2015-09-08· cited 12×
- Jander v. InternationalSecond Circuit· 2018-12-10· cited 10×
- Stowe Aviation, LLC v. Agency of Commerce & Community DevelopmentSupreme Court of Vermont· 2024-02-23· cited 4×
- Frommert v. ConkrightW.D. New York· 2016-12-12· cited 3×
- Metzler Investment GmbH and Construction Laborers Pension Trust of GreaterSecond Circuit· 2020-08-12
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court· 1999-01-25· cited 798×
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court· 1995-03-06· cited 637×
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 525×
- Robert L. Musto v. American General CorporationSixth Circuit· 1988-11-15· cited 245×
- Anthony R. Caputo David A. Cook Paul B. Pebbles Duncan B. Robertson v. Pfizer, Inc.Second Circuit· 2001-10-09· cited 182×
- Mary W. Carlson v. Principal Financial Group, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee, Eileen Carlson, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeSecond Circuit· 2003-02-12· cited 61×
- Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension PlanSecond Circuit· 1985-08-28· cited 46×
- Siskind v. Sperry Retirement Program, UnisysSecond Circuit· 1995-02-06· cited 31×
- Walling v. BradyThird Circuit· 1997-07-30· cited 30×
- Jacobson v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Ninth Circuit· 1997-01-23· cited 24×
- Pope v. Central States Southeast And Southwest Areas Health And Welfare FundSixth Circuit· 1994-08-10· cited 17×
- National Petrochemical Co. of Iran v. M/T Stolt SheafSecond Circuit· 1991-04-11· cited 17×
- Hartline v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension FundD.C. Circuit· 2002-04-23· cited 14×
- Bruh v. Bessemer Venture Partners III L.P.Second Circuit· 2006-09-13· cited 13×
- Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund v. Ulico Casualty Co.E.D. New York· 2005-09-13· cited 12×
- Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund v. Ulico Casualty Co.Second Circuit· 2006-09-25· cited 6×
- Fuchs v. AllenN.D. New York· 2005-03-29· cited 4×
- Burke v. BodewesW.D. New York· 2003-02-28· cited 4×
Other cases named Janese v. Fay
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.