Janecka v. Franklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of Title III claim brought by ex-spouse of defendant where defendant claimed concern for child motivated taping
• affirming dismissal of Title III claim brought by ex-spouse of defendant where defendant claimed concern for child motivated taping
• intercepts by recording device attached to home telephone permissible under extension telephone exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Samuel B. Pollock Jr. And Laura Pollock v. Sandra T. Pollock, Oliver H. Barber, and Luann C. Glidewell
  Sixth Circuit· 1998-10-16· cited 87×
• State v. Christensen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 75×
• Scheib v. Grant
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-04-15· cited 53×
• Alameda v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-06-27· cited 38×
• Glazner v. Glazner
  Eleventh Circuit· 2003-10-16· cited 33×
• Silas v. Silas
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1996-07-12· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Barboza
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2002-03-01· cited 14×
• Scheib v. Grant
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-06-02· cited 8×
• Stinson v. Larson
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2004-03-19· cited 5×
• State v. Christensen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-01-31· cited 3×
• Janecka v. Franklin
  Second Circuit· 1988-04-04· cited 2×