Samuel B. Pollock Jr. And Laura Pollock v. Sandra T. Pollock, Oliver H. Barber, and Luann C. Glidewell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the consent exception contained in 18 U.S.C. § 2511(2)(d
• declining to follow these cases but citing them as some support for its holding exempting parental recording of a minor child's conversations under the \consent\ exception to the wiretap statute
• “while these cases address the question from a different perspective ... the end result — that these kinds of wiretaps should be permitted in certain instances — supports adoption of [the vicarious consent] doctrine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).