Jamshid Irshad v. Rand Beers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing reasons for agency delay as part of TRAC analysis and concluding that the agency delay was not unreasonable
• considering an unreasonable delay claim pursuant to the APA but stating that “we need not address questions of ‘statutory jurisdiction’ sua sponte” because the issue was not raised on appeal
• finding jurisdiction over case of unreasonable delay in adjudicating adjustment-of-status application
• “The officials do not contend on appeal that any statute precluded the district court from considering Irshad’s claim, and we need not address question of ‘statutory jurisdiction’ sua sponte
• courts may but need not address statutory jurisdiction sua sponte
• applying the TRAC factors “to evaluate the reasonableness of delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sandeep Thigulla v. Ur Jaddou
  Eighth Circuit· 2024-03-05· cited 54×
• Svelte Constr., LLC v. Baran
  D. Maine· 2019-03-18· cited 2×
• Conley F. Monk, Jr. v. Robert L. Wilkie
  Veterans Claims· 2018-08-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
• Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 1,545×
• Telecommunications Research & Action Center v. Federal Communications Commission
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-10-24· cited 612×
• Kramer, Mark Lee v. Rumsfeld, Donald
  D.C. Circuit· 2007-03-06· cited 159×
• Royal Siam Corp. v. Chertoff
  First Circuit· 2007-04-27· cited 70×
• Wieslaw Lukowski v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
  Eighth Circuit· 2002-01-18· cited 59×
• Al-Rifahe v. Mayorkas
  D. Minnesota· 2011-03-07· cited 12×
• Sharadanant v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
  D. North Dakota· 2008-02-13· cited 1×