Jamshid Irshad v. Rand Beers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing reasons for agency delay as part of TRAC analysis and concluding that the agency delay was not unreasonable
• considering an unreasonable delay claim pursuant to the APA but stating that “we need not address questions of ‘statutory jurisdiction’ sua sponte” because the issue was not raised on appeal
• finding jurisdiction over case of unreasonable delay in adjudicating adjustment-of-status application
• “The officials do not contend on appeal that any statute precluded the district court from considering Irshad’s claim, and we need not address question of ‘statutory jurisdiction’ sua sponte
• courts may but need not address statutory jurisdiction sua sponte
• applying the TRAC factors “to evaluate the reasonableness of delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).