Jamie Peterson v. David Heymes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying qualified immunity where the plaintiff’s claim that defendants conspired to deprive him of constitutional rights was supported by factual assertions
• finding vacated conviction also vacates preliminary court finding of voluntary confession
• “The preclusive effect of a state court judgment is determined by state law.”
• “[V]acated rulings have no preclusive effect under Michigan law.”
• “We analyze qualified immunity separately for each defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).