Wayne M. Zilich v. Gary Lucht, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding plaintiff stated access- to-courts claim by alleging deprivation of legal materials hindered defense in pending court proceedings
• finding that removal is a statutory right, and the procedures to effect removal must be followed
• pro se plaintiff “has before him the formidable task of avoiding summary judgment by producing evidence ‘such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for [him].’”
• pro se plaintiff “has before him the formidable task of avoiding summary judgment by producing evidence ‘such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for [him].’”
• pro se plaintiff “has before him the formidable task of avoiding summary judgment by producing evidence ‘such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for [him].’”
• “Where, as in the case at hand, a prisoner’s complaint alleges the taking of legal property that results in the denial of his access to the courts, the Parratt/ Hudson analysis cannot, and does not, apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).