Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/29/1987

James v. Yasunaga

Citations

510 N.E.2d 531
157 Ill. App. 3d 450
109 Ill. Dec. 663
1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 2725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

supporting the trial court’s enforcement of its discovery schedule and rejected the plaintiffs’ contention that trial was still three months away as “irrelevant” if a disclosure schedule is “to have any force or effect”
while reviewing the propriety of a summary judgment, the court declined to consider portions of a deposition because the record was insufficient to manifest that the offered portions were, in fact, brought to the attention of the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.