Scheibel v. Groeteka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• any error resulting from mention of plaintiff’s financial status in opening statement and plaintiff’s testimony that he was only working because of his poor financial position was harmless
• future medical expenses could reasonably be inferred given the evidence on the nature of the plaintiff's disability, despite lack of medical testimony on amount of expenses
• future medical expenses could reasonably be inferred given the evidence on the nature of the plaintiff’s disability, despite lack of medical testimony on amount of expenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).