James v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This Court has repeatedly held that a defendant must object to the instruction and must submit written requested instructions should he not be satisfied with the instructions of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kiriluk
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1999-02-11· cited 16×
• Bristow v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-07-28· cited 7×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roberts v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1986-03-20· cited 16×
• Nash v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1984-07-25· cited 10×
• Dotson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1987-07-07· cited 4×