Bristow v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the unit of prosecution for failure to appear is the act of nonappearance, rather than the number of bonds forfeited
• holding that the unit of prosecution for failure to appear is the act of nonappearance, rather than the number of bonds forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garvin
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-05· cited 126×
• Marascio, Eric Reed
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-10-07· cited 36×
• Lennon v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-07-15· cited 15×
• State v. Murray
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1997-10-21· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hunnicutt v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1988-05-05· cited 43×
• Hale v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-01-20· cited 35×
• McGee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-19· cited 17×
• People v. Albarran
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-07-14· cited 10×
• James v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-10-01· cited 3×