Wyoming Supreme Court· 12/29/1994

James v. State

Citations

888 P.2d 200
1994 Wyo. LEXIS 173
1994 WL 716930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a lapse of fifteen to twenty minutes did not preclude a statement from qualifying as an excited utterance
holding that a lapse of fifteen to twenty minutes did not preclude a statement from qualifying as an excited utterance
“find[ing] no prejudice in the prosecutor’s statement that appellant had spent four years corrupting the victim” where “[t]he trial court sustained appellant’s objection to the comment and immediately declared it a misstatement of the facts”
applying exception where statements were made fifteen to thirty minutes after event

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Golden, Thomas, Cardine, MacY, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.