Skip to main content

James v. Hubbard

Citations

  • 21 S.W.3d 558
  • 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 3167
  • 2000 WL 565109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • judge’s statement he was “going to grant the divorce” once the final decree was on his desk did not suffice as a rendering
  • judge's statement he was \going to grant the divorce\ once the final decree was on his desk did not suffice as a rendering
  • judge's statement he was \going to grant the divorce\ once the final decree was on his desk did not suffice as a rendering
  • “A trial court's judgment is the final indication of what relief it granted or denied with regard to specific causes of action.”
  • “[although expired temporary protective orders and restraining orders have been considered moot, none of these cases has carried the same social stigma as a protective order granted based on a finding of family violence”
  • A A trial court's judgment is the final indication of what relief it granted or denied with regard to specific causes of action. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardberger, Rickhoff, Lopez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named James v. Hubbard

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.