Reese v. Piperi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 329b requires a “written and signed order,” not an oral ruling
• “[t]he judge’s intention to render judgment in the future cannot be a present rendition of judgment.”
• “The rendition of judgment is a present act, either by spoken word or signed memorandum, which decides the issues upon which the ruling is made.”
• “The rendition of judgment is a present act, either by spoken word or signed memorandum, which decides the issues upon which the ruling is made.”
• \The opportunities for error and confusion may be minimized if judgments will be rendered only in writing and signed by the trial judge after careful examination.\
• trial judge’s statement that he was required to grant a motion for new trial and “will grant it” unless the parties resolved their differences was not a present rendition of judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).