· 11/5/1993
James v. Frame
Citations
- 6 F.3d 307
- 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1519
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28792
- 1993 WL 419946
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court did not abuse its discretion when awarding punitive damages without a hearing
- stating that the court relied on affidavits, documentary evidence, and the judge's personal knowledge of the record
- stating that the court relied on affidavits, documentary evidence, and the judge’s personal knowledge of the record
- noting that a district court has “wide latitude” in deciding whether to require an evidentiary hearing when granting default judgment
- noting that a district court has “wide latitude” in deciding whether to require an evidentiary hearing when granting default judgment
- noting that a district court has “wide latitude” in deciding whether to require an evidentiary hearing when granting default judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wisdom, Jolly, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.