Skip to main content
· 11/5/1993

James v. Frame

Citations

  • 6 F.3d 307
  • 27 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1519
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 28792
  • 1993 WL 419946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court did not abuse its discretion when awarding punitive damages without a hearing
  • stating that the court relied on affidavits, documentary evidence, and the judge's personal knowledge of the record
  • stating that the court relied on affidavits, documentary evidence, and the judge’s personal knowledge of the record
  • noting that a district court has “wide latitude” in deciding whether to require an evidentiary hearing when granting default judgment
  • noting that a district court has “wide latitude” in deciding whether to require an evidentiary hearing when granting default judgment
  • noting that a district court has “wide latitude” in deciding whether to require an evidentiary hearing when granting default judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wisdom, Jolly, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.