Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. PARTH ENTERPRISES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that this factor favored default judgment and “possibility of excusable neglect is remote” where defendant had been properly served
• holding that service on defaulting party is required only if the party has appeared in the action
• reasoning that denial of default 7 judgment results in prejudice when it leaves a plaintiff without recourse to recover
• holding this factor 4 “requires that the court assess whether the recovery sought is proportional to the harm caused by 5 defendant’s conduct.”
• holding this factor 5 “requires that the court assess whether the recovery sought is proportional to the harm caused by 6 defendant’s conduct.”
• holding this factor 17 “requires that the court assess whether the recovery sought is proportional to the harm caused by 18 defendant’s conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).