James MacKlin v. Albert Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• moving party's memorandum and exhibits did not meet 56(e) criteria and could not have been relied upon
• moving party’s memorandum and exhibits did not meet 56(e) criteria and could not have been relied upon
• reversal of grant of summary judgment where trial judge ruled without the benefit of appellant’s submissions which appellant represented would have set forth specific, controverted, and material facts
• “It is clear that pleadings may incorporate earlier pleadings by reference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).