Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 10/16/1972

James Chongris v. Hugh A. Corrigan

Citations

  • 409 U.S. 919
  • 93 S. Ct. 218
  • 34 L. Ed. 2d 181
  • 1972 U.S. LEXIS 1115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • members of racial and ethnic groups constitutionally protected from purposeful maneuvers to deprive them of political effectiveness
  • even though quantitative equality is preserved, members of a racial or ethnic group are protected from invidious minimization of their voting strength
  • even though quantitative equality is preserved, members of a racial or ethnic group are protected from invidious minimization of their voting strength
  • members of racial and ethnic groups constitutionally protected from purposeful maneuvers to deprive them of political effectiveness
  • in municipal redistricting ease court held that although reapportionment litigation affects interests of large class and such actions are usually brought as class actions, the class action device is not essential

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.