James A. Dombrowski v. Colonel Thomas D. Burbank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court refused to enjoin chairman and chief counsel of a Senate subcommittee from using records that were seized by state officials in alleged conspiracy with subcommittee
• “Whether this apparently approving action by the full Subcommittee would serve as a nunc pro tunc ratification and consequent validation of the subpoena for all purposes, we need not decide.”
• “Whether this apparently approving action by the full Subcommittee would serve as a nunc pro tunc ratification and consequent validation of the subpoena for all purposes, we need not decide.”
• “Whether this apparently approving action by the full Subcommittee would serve as a nunc pro tunc ratification and consequent validation of the subpoena for all purposes, we need not decide.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).